Oil Spill Calculations Stir Debate on Damage - New York Times

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)
The Obama administration’s latest report on the Gulf of Mexico disaster set off a war of words Wednesday among scientists, Gulf Coast residents and political pundits about what to make of the Deepwater Horizon spill and its aftermath.

Visit http://geicoinsuranceproducts.wordpress.com/ for GEICO Insurance Products News / Reviews.

The report, the subject of an extended White House briefing, claimed that most of the estimated 4.9 million barrels of oil that have leaked into the gulf could be accounted for, that much of it was effectively gone already, and that most of the remaining oil was in a highly diluted form. The implication of the report was that future damage from the oil might be less than had been feared. That suggestion was not happily received on the Gulf Coast, where people are still coping with the collapse of fishing and tourism and saw the report as fresh evidence that the Obama administration was preparing to abandon them in the same way they felt the Bush administration did after Hurricane Katrina .

Oil Spill Calculations Stir Debate on Damage - New York Times

0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Oil Spill Calculations Stir Debate on Damage - New York Times.

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.hydraulic-oiltanks.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/13956

Leave a comment